Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:38:46 08/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 23, 2001 at 18:02:17, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >Hi Uri, > >games with longer time controls are for sure better for statistics. >If I play the 20 AP tourneys with 40 in 120, the tournament is 3 years still >running. > >40 in 10 on a dual system is a good time control. Every game 30 minutes and for >this experiment is this enough. > >Only a hand full programs which I know have in all my computer chess games >little different in the performance with different time controls. I mean only >the statistics. The material with longer time controls is clearly better and >more interesting. But which person have the time to play interesting tournaments >with 40 in 120. > >It was only a little experiment ... just for fun for me ... and I have a lot of >fun. Here blitz games are better for looking, I mean I have not the time to look >live in a game with the time control 40 in 120 hours. > >I hope that the results and statistics are interesting for every one. I make me >here a lot of work in the last 2 months with this little experiment and I know >that user have fun on this page. > >Best >Frank You can do a tournament of 40 in 1 minute and we can compare the results to get a conjecture which programs earns more from time. I guess that most of the programs that perform better at 40 in 10 and not at 40 in 1 are going to continue to perform better at 40 in 120. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.