Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 02:45:16 08/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2001 at 00:38:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 23, 2001 at 18:02:17, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>Hi Uri, >> >>games with longer time controls are for sure better for statistics. >>If I play the 20 AP tourneys with 40 in 120, the tournament is 3 years still >>running. >> >>40 in 10 on a dual system is a good time control. Every game 30 minutes and for >>this experiment is this enough. >> >>Only a hand full programs which I know have in all my computer chess games >>little different in the performance with different time controls. I mean only >>the statistics. The material with longer time controls is clearly better and >>more interesting. But which person have the time to play interesting tournaments >>with 40 in 120. >> >>It was only a little experiment ... just for fun for me ... and I have a lot of >>fun. Here blitz games are better for looking, I mean I have not the time to look >>live in a game with the time control 40 in 120 hours. >> >>I hope that the results and statistics are interesting for every one. I make me >>here a lot of work in the last 2 months with this little experiment and I know >>that user have fun on this page. >> >>Best >>Frank > >You can do a tournament of 40 in 1 minute and we can compare the results to get >a conjecture which programs earns more from time. > >I guess that most of the programs that perform better at 40 in 10 and not at 40 >in 1 are going to continue to perform better at 40 in 120. > >Uri Hi Uri, my CCE tourney is now 14 months still running with 40 in 40 !! Please no more of this tourneys ... I have played enough games. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.