Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Congratulation for chesstiger(better performance than shredder in wmccc)

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 07:56:16 08/24/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 24, 2001 at 10:50:25, Jeroen Noomen wrote:

>On August 24, 2001 at 07:06:51, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>Hi Uri,
>
>IMO these statistics make no sense. I rather would like to see
>Tiger being the first single program than having a better Elo
>performance.
>
>Jeroen

I understand but I think that it is still better to have a better prformance
than having nothing.

Tiger does not have a public title but justice tells me to give it my title(I
will give my title to Shredder if Shredder is going to be in a similiar
situation when it has better performance without getting a public title)

Uri
>
>
>
>
>>Here are the results by
>>elostat program
>>
>>You can see that shredder is only 3th place micro based on the performance.
>>Shredder is the world Micro champion by definition but Tiger and Rebel had a
>>better performance.
>>
>>
>>1 Deep Junior 7                  : 2745  228 281     9    88.9 %   2384   22.2 %
>>2 Quest (DeepFritz)              : 2550  266 169     9    66.7 %   2430   44.4 %
>>3 Chess Tiger 14.6 Gambit Tiger  : 2499  291 229     9    55.6 %   2461   22.2 %
>>4 Crafty 18.10X                  : 2467  291 165     9    55.6 %   2428   44.4 %
>>5 Rebel                          : 2466  291 229     9    55.6 %   2428   22.2 %
>>6 Shredder                       : 2466  266 249     9    66.7 %   2346   22.2 %
>>7 Goliath                        : 2421  291 165     9    55.6 %   2382   44.4 %
>>8 Gromit 3.9.5                   : 2364  278 201     9    61.1 %   2285   33.3 %
>>9 Ferret                         : 2359  291 229     9    55.6 %   2320   22.2
>>%10 Gandalf 5.0                   : 2310  291 229     9    55.6 %   2271   22.2
>>%
>>11 ParSOS                        : 2256  291 229     9    55.6 %   2217   22.2 %
>>12 Diep                          : 2227  165 291     9    44.4 %   2265   44.4 %
>>13 IsiChess X                    : 2166  201 278     9    38.9 %   2245   33.3 %
>>14 Tao                           : 2165  229 291     9    44.4 %   2203   22.2 %
>>15 Ruy Lopez                     : 2118  366 266     9    33.3 %   2238    0.0 %
>>16 Pharaon                       : 2082  169 266     9    33.3 %   2202   44.4 %
>>17 SpiderGirl                    : 2014  213 255     9    27.8 %   2180   33.3 %
>>18 XiNiX                         : 1724  400 108     9     5.6 %   2216   11.1 %
>>
>>congratulation also for the Deep Junior team for winning the event convincingly
>>when the difference from the second place is almost 200 elo and the hardware
>>explain less than 70 elo difference.
>>
>>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.