Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:16:56 08/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2001 at 14:03:47, James T. Walker wrote: >The simple point is that if Tiger had beat Shredder then everyone would be >asking Shredder what went wrong. shredder did not win this time this convincingly. it had problems. of course one main reason why shredder wins, although it begins weak is: that shredder has more knowledge. in middlegame AND in endgame. this is often important, even when your position is weaker. i think tiger and rebel have a lack in those areas. and thats the reason they have problems. > When the chances are relatively even and one >game decides the champion then why does something have to be wrong with the >other guy????? chances. chess is not throwing a coin. the coin gets thrown each move. again and again, until 40 times or more. not one event. 70 events in one game. if you lack knowledge, the chances that this could be a problem are relevant more often than throwing ONE coin. > Of course there is always room for improvement and I'm sure >Christophe will continue to improve the Tiger as he has in the past. >Bottom line for the idiots! - - - Nothing is wrong! this will not stop the idiots. wait when they have read about the event in some cheap papers... in the moment those papers have not yet been published :-))
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.