Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:23:01 08/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2001 at 16:38:19, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On August 24, 2001 at 16:22:35, K. Burcham wrote: > > >> >>Engine: Shredder 5 >>by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen >> >> 8.01 0:01 +1.39 1.e5 Bh4 2.Re2 f4 3.exd6 f3 4.Re4 f2+ 5.Kf1 Bxe4 6.dxe4 >>Qxd6 (307.873) 184.2 >> 9.01 0:03 +1.46 1.e5 Bh4 2.Re2 f4 3.exd6 f3 4.Re4 f2+ 5.Kf1 Qxg2+ 6.Kxg2 >>f1Q+ 7.Kh2 Bxe4 8.dxe4 cxd6 9.axb5 axb5 10.Rxa8 Rxa8 (689.668) 189.1 >> 10.01 0:09 +1.25 1.e5 Bh4 2.Rf1 Nf7 3.d4 Ng5 4.Qe3 Ne4 5.Ra2 Rae8 >>(1.721.439) 190.2 >> 11.01 0:16 +1.00-- 1.e5 Bh4 2.Rf1 Nf7 3.d4 Ng5 4.Qe3 f4 5.Qd2 Nf3+ 6.Kh1 >>(3.103.212) 189.2 >> 11.01 0:20 +0.50-- 1.e5 Bh4 2.Rf1 f4 3.exd6 f3 4.Rf2 Bxf2+ 5.Qxf2 fxg2 >>6.axb5 Qxd3 7.bxa6 Rxf2 8.dxc7 (3.908.308) 188.3 >> 11.01 0:39 +0.50 1.e5 Bh4 2.Rd1 Nf7 3.Bxf7 Qxf7 4.axb5 axb5 5.Rxa8 Rxa8 >>6.Qe2 Be4 7.Bb2 (7.454.018) 187.9 >> 12.01 1:24 +0.59 1.e5 Bh4 2.Rd1 Nf7 3.Bxf7 Qxf7 4.axb5 axb5 5.Rxa8 Rxa8 >>6.Qe2 Ra6 7.Rf1 Qg6 (15.681.071) 186.4 >> 13.01 2:19 +0.34-- 1.e5 Bh4 2.Rd1 bxa4 3.Rxa4 f4 4.exd6 f3 5.g4 f2+ 6.Kf1 >>Rfe8 7.d4 Re1+ 8.Qxe1 fxe1B 9.Rxe1 Qxb1 (25.756.300) 184.6 >> 13.01 3:54 -0.16-- 1.e5 Bh4 2.Rd1 f4 3.exd6 f3 4.Kf1 f2 5.axb5 Bxg2+ 6.Ke2 >>axb5 7.Rxa8 (43.306.903) 184.4 >> 13.01 35:29 -0.99 1.e5 Bh4 2.Rf1 f4 3.Bd1 Nf5 4.Bf3 Qb6+ 5.d4 Ne3 6.Qe2 Nxf1 >>7.Qxf1 Bxf3 8.Qxf3 Rae8 9.Qe4 Bg3 (385.718.130) 181.1 >> 13.03 39:23 -0.98++ 1.Bd5 Bh4 2.Re2 Bxd5 3.exd5 Bf2+ 4.Kxf2 Ne4+ 5.dxe4 fxe4+ >>6.Ke1 Rf1+ 7.Kxf1 Qxg2+ 8.Rxg2 Rf8+ 9.Kg1 (429.625.973) 181.7 >> 13.03 43:43 -0.97 1.Bd5 Bh4 2.Re2 c6 3.exf5 Rxf5 4.Be4 Nxe4 5.dxe4 Rf3 6.Kh2 >>(477.152.414) 181.8 >> 14.01 63:18 -1.22-- 1.Bd5 Bh4 2.Re2 c6 3.exf5 Nxf5 4.Bb3 Ng3 5.Re1 Rae8 >>6.Rxe8 Qxe8 7.a5 Rf1+ 8.Kh2 Ne2 (691.808.541) 182.1 >> 14.01 71:01 -1.28 1.Bd5 Bh4 2.Bxb7 Bxe1 3.Qxe1 Nxb7 4.axb5 axb5 5.Rxa8 Rxa8 >>6.Na3 Qb6+ 7.d4 fxe4 (778.057.412) 182.5 >>best move: Bb3-d5 time: 78:29.582 min n/s: 182.076 nodes: 857.503.017 >> >> >>kburcham > >After move Bb3???, was white lost this is clear! both Bd5 and e5 losing, other >moves too! My question was not whether e5 or Bd5 is better move. > >In my question me interest only, why white play a move with negativ score, Bd5 >with -0.80, and not e5 only -0.22 ? > >Eduard The -0.22 was at depth 13 when the -0.80 was at depth 14 so these scores cannot be compared. Tiger did not give score for e5 at depth 14 and I guess it only saw that it was bad without an exact score and only knew that the score is worse than -0.8 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.