Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Question to Jeroen: What went wrong with Tiger?

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 00:59:02 08/25/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 24, 2001 at 19:44:06, Uri Blass wrote:

>On August 24, 2001 at 19:14:34, Harald Faber wrote:
>
>>On August 24, 2001 at 12:33:26, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On August 24, 2001 at 11:41:47, Harald Faber wrote:
>>>
>>>>With these losses it is justified that Tiger didn't become single world
>>>>champion. What is your explanation for this result? Did you play GT in
>>>>aggressive mode? What made Tiger lose especially the last game vs. an amateur?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I can answer your question if you answer mine:
>>>
>>>When you flip a coin, why is it head sometimes, and some other time it is tail?
>>>
>>>    Christophe
>>
>>I hoped you wouldn't answer that way.
>>1st: IMO Tiger is the strongest program available, even if slightly ahead of the
>>others.
>>2nd: I am not disappointed about the Tiger result as you may suppose.
>>3rd: I am only curious how the rock solid and tactical safe Tiger could lose a)
>>vs. SOS (I'd have bet a lot that at least a draw is the worst result the Tiger
>>plays vs. an amateur)
>
>1)The gap between tiger and the best amatuers is not so big that tiger cannot
>lose one game

Ya, but I'd expect the number of games Tiger loses vs. an amateur is not so high
so that I'd expect only a probability of not more than 20-30%. So IMO this was a
very unlikely result.

>What are the mistakes that tiger did that the commercial version can avoid?

I haven't compared with my Tiger here because my computer is much slower than
the used one and I don't have the spen times sso re-playing does not make much
sense. I bet that more than 5 moves wil be different if I'd try to reproduce
Tiges moves.

>>Why am I curious and astonished? Because I have seen *many* SUPERIOUR games
>>Tiger played. Of course he loses from time to time, but not vs. anyone and
>>especially Jeroen's opening preparation usually gives Tiger some advantage. That
>>makes me wonder.
>
>Tiger is not god
>Tiger can lose vs every strong amatuer if you play enough games.
>
>Uri

Maybe I am too convinced of Tigers strength that I cannot imagine a loss vs. an
amateur?! :-)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.