Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 19:45:06 08/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 24, 2001 at 15:08:03, Bill McGaugh wrote: another wrong assumption, in your example the learning and having a wide book are important, in world champs both are NOT important. best regards, Vincent >I could select a random string of games from these huge sets and see sets of >games where one side appeared terrible in the endgame or tactical inferior... > >and I could also select for the exact reverse... > >how can much be concluded for a string of 9 games...or 20 games...? > >with 100 games, some patterns emerge...but you can see that the totals don't >always tell the whole truth.... > >The More Games the Better! > >When you see one program slaughter another in the first few games that you have >seen between them....get excited...but also be patient...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.