Author: Moritz Berger
Date: 11:27:02 05/13/98
Go up one level in this thread
Let's count: On May 13, 1998 at 06:12:00, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >KK kup was fake. Diep got black in the only 2 important games. >Just 2 games. Excuse 1. >And Diep got outbooked by both programs. >Game against Rebel it was directly lost. Diep's horrible in French. >Just look at ICC the % of wins of Diep in French. Excuse 2. >2500 SSDF says nothing. Excuse 3. >Don't you get it, all programs sent to Sweden have played say 10000 >auto232 games or something. Attack 1. >Sweden became one big book tuning event. Speculation 1. >In the future this might change if books get more variaty. Ignorance 1. >Until then this Sweden list is laughable. Attack 2. >How can a program like Fritz5 which loses normally to all those programs >can get on top? Attack 3. >How can Rebel9 get stronger than 8, considering that the only >4 things changed are interface,few extensions to solve some tricks, >BOOKLEARNING, and with capital letters BOOK. Attack 4. >The program didn't play better, yet it got a higher elorating because it >scored better in matches. Attack 5. >That kind of comparision is wrong. It won't play better against humans >than Rebel8 nor will it play better in tournaments. Attack 6. >A simple 1.d4,d5 2.Bf4 was enough for Diep in aufsess tournament >to beat it. Attack 7. >No doubt that when i send my program to Sweden that i will >have played some hundreds ot auto232 games too (i'm only >having a Pentium pro 200 and a laptop 133, so i can't produce >thousands of games like the pro's). Excuse 4. >Your computerchess insight is laughable. Attack 8. Sum ----- 8 attacks, 4 (IMHO lame) excuses, 1 speculative and 1 completely ignorant remark. Total: 14 "reputation points" for Vincent. Congratulations!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.