Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Wanted: Deep Blue vs. today's top programs recap

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 02:38:51 08/26/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 26, 2001 at 05:16:15, Mike S. wrote:

>On August 25, 2001 at 21:42:43, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>let's look to facts, ignoring it played kasparov
>>  - deep blue searched between 11 and 13 ply, most likely 12 ply
>
>I have read that it searched deeper (the SP/2 8...9 plies during the middlegame,
>and the chess hardware 5...7 ply additionally each). This would mean, it should
>have searched 13 ply minimum, up to 16.
>
>I've seen an example of the log files which was published, where DB searched 17
>plies for the move 35.Bxd6 in game two of the Kasparov match (full board, only 2
>minor pieces were exchanged in that position).
>
>I doubt 12 or 13 ply, admitting I haven't looked into the log files (yet).
>
>Regards,
>M.Scheidl

people do not agree about the meaning of the logfiles and vincent believes that
11(6) means 11 plies and not 17 plies.

IBM claims that 11(6) means 17 plies but vincent does not believe them.

If 11(6) means 17 plies then the impression that I got based on analysis of the
logfiles is that other programs have better extensions than Deep blue because I
saw cases when they can see the same start of the main line at smaller depthes.

If people are interested in comparing the analysis of Deeper blue with the
analysis of Deep Fritz or Junior7 or Crafty18.10 then I have no problem to help
but I am not going to do alone all this project of giving top program some hours
for every position that Deeper blue pondered.

I think that complete analysis of these positions by other programs may give
better information and we can see in cases that both saw the same line if the
commercial programs are faster or Deeper blue is faster.

It seems that nobody or almost nobody except me is interested in the analysis of
the positions from these games for hours so I do not do it because if I do it
alone or almost alone it is going to take too much time.

If I spend 5 hours per position and use my computer 20 hours per week for Deeper
blue-kasparov games then I need years to finish the job and I am not interested
so much in the problem in order to give my programs more than 20 hours per week
or to wait years for all the relevant information.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.