Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 12:07:33 08/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
I am very surprised by all this. My ICC rating is below 2100. I lose mercilessly against all the top programs. I cannot concoct the beautiful attacks against the machines that other have done (like you, Eduard). I assumed that it would be impossible to exhibit a position in which a top computer plays a move that I fully understand how to refute. Yet your position is an even clearer example of just such a thing. I am certain that I, not a very strong player, could win as white after the black move you say Tiger makes. This shocks me. On August 26, 2001 at 14:56:24, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >On August 26, 2001 at 14:40:33, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>[D] 8/2r1k2p/p3p1p1/3r1p2/8/1P3PP1/P2RK2P/3R4 b - - >> >>I reached this position as white recently, and after the game I used Gambit >>Tiger 2.0 to help analyze. What occurred in the game was: >> >>1... Rcd7(?) 2. Rxd5 Rxd5?? 3. Rxd5 exd5 >> >>after which I believe white should win (which I did). I believe it's very bad >>for black to trade off both pairs of rooks, and best to avoid allowing white to >>exchange even one pair of rooks here because of isolating black's pawn. >> >>It appears that Gambit Tiger 2 on my Athlon 1.2 GHz does not really understand >>that after move white's move 3 above, white should win. And it believes the >>position is essentially equal after white's move 2. >> >>Here is its analysis after black's move 1: >> >>00:00:00.9 0.22 9 168541 h3 Kf6 Rxd5 exd5 Rc1 Ke6 Kd3 f4 Rc6+ Rd6 Rxd6+ Kxd6 >>00:00:00.3 0.16 9 184134 h3 Rxd2+ Rxd2 Rxd2+ Kxd2 e5 Ke3 Ke6 g4 fxg4 fxg4 h5 a3 >>hxg4 hxg4 >>00:00:01.9 0.12 10 445643 h3 Rxd2+ Rxd2 Rc7 Kd1 e5 Rc2 Rxc2 Kxc2 e4 fxe4 fxe4 >>Kc3 >>00:00:01.4 0.16 10 710893 Rxd5 Rxd5 Rc1 Kd6 Rc8 Rc5 Rxc5 Kxc5 Kd3 Kb4 h4 Ka3 >>00:00:02.8 0.16 11 905910 Rxd5 Rxd5 Rc1 Kd6 Rc8 Rc5 Rxc5 Kxc5 Kd3 Kd5 g4 e5 gxf5 >>gxf5 >>00:00:03.0 0.16 12 1519152 Rxd5 Rxd5 Rxd5 exd5 b4 Ke6 Ke3 Ke5 f4+ >>00:00:05.5 0.16 13 2286175 Rxd5 Rxd5 Rxd5 exd5 b4 Ke6 Ke3 Ke5 f4+ Kd6 a4 Ke6 Kd4 >>h6 b5 axb5 axb5 >>00:00:09.6 0.18 14 3833264 Rxd5 Rxd5 Rxd5 exd5 b4 Ke6 Ke3 h6 f4 g5 a3 gxf4+ Kxf4 >>d4 Kf3 d3 Ke3 >>00:00:18.1 0.20 15 7566502 Rxd5 Rxd5 Rxd5 exd5 b4 Kd6 Ke3 g5 f4 gxf4+ Kxf4 d4 a3 >>h5 Kf3 d3 Ke3 >> >> >>but after 2. Rxd5, suddenly Tiger prefers black to recapture with the pawn >>rather than the rook, and its evaluation becomes worse for black. >> >>Non-Gambit Tiger behaves very similarly. >> >>Is the lack of endgame knowledge in me or the program, or is it something else? >> >>(Using 96MB hash; Not using table bases.) > >This is NOT (!!) only position who Tiger have on "blackout" to pawn endgame. >This is real! > >here an other position (from a game Eduard - Tiger): > >[D]3k3r/1r4pp/p3Rp2/8/p7/2P5/P4PPP/R5K1 b - - 0 27 > >Tiger played now Re8??? and after Rd1+ game was lost for Tiger! > >(German: es gibt noch viel zu tun Christophe - vor allem im Bauernendspiel= >pawn endgame!) > >Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.