Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:28:57 08/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2001 at 16:38:08, Amir Ban wrote: >On August 26, 2001 at 03:58:38, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On August 25, 2001 at 22:48:58, K. Burcham wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>i analysed this game, and the score stayed at 0 most of the game, up until >>> 68. ...Ra8 >>> >>> >>>this is the position one move previous. 68. Ke5 >>> >>>in this position deep junior6 eval is +.22 at depth 24. >>> >>> >>> [D] 3r4/4R2P/6p1/3NKbk1/8/8/8/8 b - - 0 1 >>> >>> >>> >>>now in the game, deep junior7 chooses 68. ...Rd8-a8. >>>this was a six point blunder for deep junior7, and the game is over >>> with this move. >> >>I susect that it is an operator error because Junior7 never considered Ra8 as >>best and has no problem to see +3 for white even at small depthes after Ra8 >> >>Here is some analysis >> >>Junior 7 - Blass,U >>r7/4R2P/6p1/3NKbk1/8/8/8/8 w - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Junior 7: >> >>69.Ne3 Bh3 70.Rb7 Re8+ 71.Kd6 Kh6 72.Rb4 >> = (-0.12) Depth: 11 00:00:00 100kN >>69.Nf6! >> = (0.23) Depth: 11 00:00:00 277kN >>69.Nf6! Rh8 70.Re8 Rxh7 71.Nxh7+ Kh6 72.Re7 Bd3 73.Kf6 >> +- (3.15) Depth: 11 00:00:00 512kN >>69.Nf6! Rh8 70.Re8 Rxh7 71.Nxh7+ Kh6 72.Re7 Bd3 73.Kf6 >> +- (3.15) Depth: 11 00:00:00 525kN >> >>(Blass, Tel-aviv 26.08.2001) >> >>Uri > >This is blitz remember (7 minutes/game including operator time), and at move 69 >the engine already shows about 0 sec left and moves instantly. > >The blunder doesn't matter because Junior would have lost on time anyway. > >Blitz is great fun, but don't read science into the results. A lot is up to the >operator, and Goliath owes a lot to its maniacal operator Erdogan Gunes. > >I'm still trying to figure out how to do time division for these conditions. >With 3-4 sec average operator time, the choice is between allowing the engine >zero thinking time and a sure lose of time at move 80. Goliath, for example, was >setup for 3 min/game. > >Amir There are possible ideas that are not about the time division but about saving operator time. For example I believe that most or all programs can save time in cases that the opponent plays the expected move. In this case instead of telling the program the full move you can tell the program only one letter that means "expected". Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.