Author: Ernest Bonnem
Date: 03:55:21 08/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
As can be seen below, Fritzmark is not related in a simple way to the kN/s or the number of seconds to end of depth 10. Does anybody know how it is calculated ? On August 26, 2001 at 07:00:37, Sune Fischer wrote: >On August 26, 2001 at 04:39:20, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>Here's some benchmarks of my liquid cooled 1.0GHz Thunderbird at 1.61GHz (can go >>higher but due to my PSU not being able to take the strain of the cpu being over >>120 watts I hold off at 1.61, when my 400 watt comes I'll get some FritzMarks at >>1.7+ghz, 2.3v+ cpu voltage). This is the standard FritzMark with Fritz 5.32 >> >>Windows XP RC1 Fritz 5.32 - 256mb PC150 ram >>1mb hash 585 (12.0s) fritzmarks, 1540Knps >>4mb hash 799 (9.8s) fritzmarks, 1524Knps >>16mb hash 1004 (7.0s) fritzmarks, 1512Knps >>32mb hash 1034 (7.8s) fritzmarks, 1504Knps >>64mb hash 1034 (7.8s) fritzmarks, 1478Knps >>96mb hash 1019 (7.9s) fritzmarks, 1449Knps >>128mb hash 990 (7.1s) fritzmarks, 1422Knps >>184mb hash 963 (7.3s) fritzmarks, 1380Knps > >A lot of tests show windows XP to be slower than windows 2000 and windows 98, >have you tried the same test in w2k or w98?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.