Author: Slater Wold
Date: 11:37:06 08/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2001 at 14:07:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On August 27, 2001 at 14:03:16, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On August 27, 2001 at 13:17:09, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On August 27, 2001 at 12:41:10, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On August 27, 2001 at 10:46:20, Ulf Flörsheimer wrote: >>>> >>>>>In the notations it usually has been told of version 18.10x. What does x mean? >>>>>Was it Crafty 18.10 or 18.10 with a special opening book? Or was it a unreleased >>>>>version 18.11? If so, when will it be ready for download. >>>>> >>>>>I like both style and playing strength of crafty. Its Maastricht-games were >>>>>really impressive. In my opinion Crafty is one of the most underestimated >>>>>programs. It definitively prooved in Maastricht once more its legitimate >>>>>placement among all the professional programs. >>>>> >>>>>I hope that crafty's further developement will be as successful as it has been >>>>>in the past. >>>>> >>>>>Good luck for Bob Hyatt and a big "thank you" for the fun he has given to me >>>>>with crafty! >>>>> >>>>>Ulf Floersheimer >>>> >>>>Bob said earlier, it's the _SAME_ exact version running on ICC now. >>>> >>>>However, it was on a 2x1.4Ghz AMD, which is a _LOT_ faster than his 4x700. >>>> >>>>So it packed a little more punch than usual. >>>> >>>> >>>>Slate >>> >>> >>>The 2x AMD is roughly the same as my quad 700. >>> >>>quad benchmark is 1.2M nodes per second (gcc/linux) >>>dual AMD is 1.2M using MSVC/win2000. >>> >>>Actually, that makes my quad about 10% faster, since gcc is about 10% >>>slower than MSVC... >> >>Weird. My AMD 1.2Ghz gets about 800k nps. I thought for sure a 2x1.4Ghz would >>do better. At least 1.5M. That's the beauty of SMP! >> >> >>Slate > > >The one we had would only do 1.2M... no idea if there are better ones >around, of course... > >I don't quite follow the math to think that 2x1.4 would be more than 50% >faster than 2x1.2 however... Well, my thinking (estimation) was that a 1.2Ghz does 800k. Therefore a 1.4Ghz would more than likely do at least 900k. 900 * 2 = 1800 - 20% = 1.44M. If you figure a 1.2Ghz is getting 800k, than that is 666 nodes per mhz. 666 * 1400 = 932400 * 2 = 1864800 - 20% = 1491840 (or right around 1.5M) Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.