Author: Peter Berger
Date: 16:54:00 08/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2001 at 19:40:06, Slater Wold wrote: >Takes no time for Deep Shredder to find this on my AMD 1.2Ghz: > >[+0.21] d=1 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 (0:00.00) >[-0.00] d=1 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >[-0.00] d=2 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >[-0.00] d=3 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >[-0.00] d=4 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >[-0.00] d=5 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >[-0.00] d=6 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >[-0.00] d=7 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >[-0.00] d=8 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >[-0.00] d=9 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >[+0.74] d=10 1...Kd6 2.f3 Bxf3 3.Rc2 Bd5 4.Bb4+ Ke5 5.Bd6+ Kf6 6.Rf2+ Qf3 >7.Rxf3+ (0:01.08) >[+0.60] d=11 1...Kd6 2.f3 Bxf3 3.Qf2 Bxg2 4.Qxg2 Qxg2+ 5.Kxg2 e5 6.Bxe5+ >(0:02.21) > > >Slate Are you sure you tried this position without some persistant hashtables or position learning active? I get the following for Deep Shredder on an Athlon 1333 ( and this is still one of the better results of the engines I tried ) : 9.01 0:02 0.00 27...Ke8 28.f3 Lxf3 29.Db8+ Kd7 30.Da7+ Ke8 31.Db8+ (757.067) 348.2 10.01 0:03 -0.25-- 27...Ke8 28.f3 Lxf3 29.g3 Dg5 30.Lb2 f6 31.Tc8+ (1.145.778) 349.4 10.01 0:04 -0.75-- 27...Ke8 28.f3 Lxf3 29.g3 Dg5 30.Ld2 Dh5 31.Tc8+ (1.472.405) 348.5 10.01 0:15 -3.36 27...Ke8 28.f3 Lxf3 29.g3 De4 30.Lxg7 Db7 31.Dxb7 Lxb7 32.Lxh8 Kd7 33.Td1+ Ld5 34.Lb2 (5.706.171) 370.3 10.02 0:30 -3.35++ 27...Kd6 28.f3 Lxf3 29.Db6+ Ke7 30.Lxg7 Dxg7 31.Da7+ Kf6 32.De7+ Kxe7 33.Tc7+ Ke8 (11.445.970) 376.5 10.02 0:37 -3.00++ 27...Kd6 28.f3 Lxf3 29.Db6+ Ke7 30.Lxg7 Dxg7 31.Da7+ Kf6 32.De7+ Kxe7 33.Tc7+ Ke8 (14.231.948) 380.6
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.