Author: Slater Wold
Date: 19:58:31 08/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2001 at 19:54:00, Peter Berger wrote: >On August 27, 2001 at 19:40:06, Slater Wold wrote: >>Takes no time for Deep Shredder to find this on my AMD 1.2Ghz: >> >>[+0.21] d=1 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 (0:00.00) >>[-0.00] d=1 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >>[-0.00] d=2 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >>[-0.00] d=3 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >>[-0.00] d=4 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >>[-0.00] d=5 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >>[-0.00] d=6 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >>[-0.00] d=7 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >>[-0.00] d=8 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >>[-0.00] d=9 1...Kd6 2.f3 (0:00.00) >>[+0.74] d=10 1...Kd6 2.f3 Bxf3 3.Rc2 Bd5 4.Bb4+ Ke5 5.Bd6+ Kf6 6.Rf2+ Qf3 >>7.Rxf3+ (0:01.08) >>[+0.60] d=11 1...Kd6 2.f3 Bxf3 3.Qf2 Bxg2 4.Qxg2 Qxg2+ 5.Kxg2 e5 6.Bxe5+ >>(0:02.21) >> >> >>Slate > >Are you sure you tried this position without some persistant hashtables or >position learning active? > >I get the following for Deep Shredder on an Athlon 1333 ( and this is still one >of the better results of the engines I tried ) : > >9.01 0:02 0.00 27...Ke8 28.f3 Lxf3 29.Db8+ Kd7 30.Da7+ Ke8 31.Db8+ (757.067) >348.2 > 10.01 0:03 -0.25-- 27...Ke8 28.f3 Lxf3 29.g3 Dg5 30.Lb2 f6 31.Tc8+ >(1.145.778) 349.4 > 10.01 0:04 -0.75-- 27...Ke8 28.f3 Lxf3 29.g3 Dg5 30.Ld2 Dh5 31.Tc8+ >(1.472.405) 348.5 > 10.01 0:15 -3.36 27...Ke8 28.f3 Lxf3 29.g3 De4 30.Lxg7 Db7 31.Dxb7 Lxb7 >32.Lxh8 Kd7 33.Td1+ Ld5 34.Lb2 (5.706.171) 370.3 > 10.02 0:30 -3.35++ 27...Kd6 28.f3 Lxf3 29.Db6+ Ke7 30.Lxg7 Dxg7 31.Da7+ Kf6 >32.De7+ Kxe7 33.Tc7+ Ke8 (11.445.970) 376.5 > 10.02 0:37 -3.00++ 27...Kd6 28.f3 Lxf3 29.Db6+ Ke7 30.Lxg7 Dxg7 31.Da7+ Kf6 >32.De7+ Kxe7 33.Tc7+ Ke8 (14.231.948) 380.6 Must have been. I was using the Chess Assistant 6.1 GUI, and thought I had cleared the memory. (I had just fired it up.) My Shredder 5 GUI results look exactly like yours. Shredder 5: Engine: Shredder 5 by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen 8.01 0:00 0.00 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 3.Qb8+ Ke7 4.Qc7+ Ke8 5.Qc8+ Ke7 6.Qc7+ Ke8 (245.701) 299.2 9.01 0:02 0.00 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 3.Qb8+ Ke7 4.Qc7+ Ke8 5.Qc8+ Ke7 6.Qc7+ Ke8 (650.882) 312.4 10.01 0:08 -0.25-- 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 3.g3 Qh3 4.Rc2 Qf5 5.Bb4 Rf8 6.Bxf8 Bg2 7.Rxg2 Qc5+ 8.Qxc5 (2.617.794) 321.5 10.01 0:09 -0.75-- 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 3.g3 Qh3 4.Rc2 Qf5 5.Bb4 Rf8 6.Bxf8 Bg2 7.Rxg2 Qc5+ 8.Qxc5 (3.075.193) 321.5 10.01 0:49 -3.28 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 3.g3 Qe4 4.Bxg7 Qb7 5.Qxb7 Bxb7 6.Bxh8 Kd7 7.Bf6 Bd5 8.Kf2 h5 (16.815.668) 338.5 10.02 0:54 -3.27++ 1...Kd6 2.Qxf7 (18.696.936) 340.1 Deep Shredder: Engine: Deep Shredder by Stefan Meyer-Kahlen 8.01 0:00 0.00 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 3.Qb8+ Kd7 4.Qa7+ Ke8 5.Qb8+ (200.650) 299.0 9.01 0:02 0.00 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 3.Qb8+ Kd7 4.Qa7+ Ke8 5.Qb8+ (755.191) 314.1 10.01 0:03 -0.25-- 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 3.g3 Qg5 4.Bb2 Qh5 5.Rc8+ (1.154.351) 314.0 10.01 0:04 -0.75-- 1...Ke8 2.f3 Bxf3 3.g3 Qg5 4.Bd2 Qh5 5.Rc8+ (1.405.104) 314.5 10.01 0:21 -3.39 1...Ke8 2.f3 Qg5 3.Rb1 Bb5 4.Qb8+ Ke7 5.Bb4+ Kf6 6.Qxh8 Qe3+ 7.Kh1 Qd3 8.Bc3+ Kg5 9.Qxg7+ Qg6 10.Rxb5+ Kh4 11.Qxg6 (7.096.610) 328.6 10.02 0:36 -3.38++ 1...Kd6 2.f3 Bxf3 3.Qb6+ Ke7 4.Bxg7 Qxg7 5.Qa7+ Kf6 6.Qxf7+ Qxf7 (12.179.514) 334.1 10.02 0:46 -3.03++ 1...Kd6 2.f3 Bxf3 3.Qb6+ Ke7 4.Bxg7 Qxg7 5.Qa7+ Kf6 6.Qe7+ Kxe7 7.Rc7+ (15.631.274) 337.1 Looks like Deep Shredder might not be any smart, but at least it's a little faster. :) Sorry about that. I thought the hash was cleared. Slate
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.