Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 03:12:22 08/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2001 at 04:45:39, Uri Blass wrote: >On August 28, 2001 at 04:33:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On August 28, 2001 at 04:24:12, Ingo Bauer wrote: >> >>I do not have the mogens book, but yace is completely >>annihilated because it has bad luck against diep that >> >> a) it plays very passive >> b) it's tactical not so strong >> c) it doesn't take action like nowadays commercials all do. >> >>playing passive against diep is not the way to play against it, >>it will find a positional pattern and win! >> >>I played against yace not too many games but score was about the same >>as the score against patzer: 80%. > >It only can get these results in your private games. >In tournaments it cannot beat even spiddergirl >and spiddergirl had no kure book. > >You blame the book but >I do not believe that spiddergirl had a better book and if your engine >is so strong you can start with 1.h3 and win the game >at least against amatuers like spiddergirl. > >The results that I see in tournaments do not suggest that >diep is better at long time control relative to the opponents. You're dead wrong. first of all spidergirl got out of book against diep (that is diep got out of book) in a dead drawn bishop endgame. No fun for diep to win that of course and we quickly had a draw. I used pesce book there. In case of the d4 g3 line that was a mistake. probably 1.d4,a6 would have meant a win indeed. Secondly i play loads of games here and spidergirl was just one game with a weird opening, whereas most amateurs with automated books have a problem against pesce as the mainlines are nice covered also in pesce as well as some popular sidelines. >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.