Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 03:15:56 08/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2001 at 05:52:20, Mogens Larsen wrote: DIEP is very good in annihilating amateurs in long matches, because they are too passive usually. If you do shit against diep, then you're history. See some stupid openings moves diep made against this anmon program. I'm amazed you guys react without watching the games. diep played in first game f3? and gets stupid endgame IMHO, then it wins the endgame. note this is the WMCC version, not a byte different from what played at maastricht, except that this is the single cpu version so it doesn't lock stuff. >On August 28, 2001 at 04:33:44, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>I do not have the mogens book, but yace is completely >>annihilated because it has bad luck against diep that > >Too bad there aren't any official tournaments being played in your living room. >Otherwise Diep would have numerous titles to its name. > >Lameness aside, I doubt that Diep can annihilate any of the more known amateurs. >Let alone Yace. > >> a) it plays very passive >> b) it's tactical not so strong >> c) it doesn't take action like nowadays commercials all do. > >Yace can be a bit passive. The tactical ability is as good as any of the >amateurs IMO. > >>playing passive against diep is not the way to play against it, >>it will find a positional pattern and win! > >Wishful thinking IMO. In a contest between Diep and Yace, I would put my money >on Yace. Unless you're conducting the test of course :-). > >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.