Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 03:36:58 08/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2001 at 06:15:56, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >DIEP is very good in annihilating amateurs in long matches, >because they are too passive usually. If you do shit against diep, >then you're history. > >See some stupid openings moves diep made against this >anmon program. I'm amazed you guys react without watching >the games. > >diep played in first game f3? and gets stupid endgame IMHO, then >it wins the endgame. > >note this is the WMCC version, not a byte different from what >played at maastricht, except that this is the single cpu version >so it doesn't lock stuff. I didn't make any comments on AnMon. AnMon's endgame ability still needs a few improvements, which the author is trying to address. Nothing new there. My beef with you is your ignorance about other programs. In this case Yace, but you've been taking cheap shots at others as well after Maastricht. That combined with the limited success of Diep, I take to be an expression of envy. Good mental health, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.