Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 06:40:45 08/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2001 at 05:48:58, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 28, 2001 at 04:39:54, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>Now i don't care about gromit in this story, didn't even want to do >>effort to translate the stuff, but the ANSWER from Andreas can mean >>2 things >> a) Bob can claim money from chessbase >> b) Andreas is lying > >c) Andreas doesn't like that it is claimed the title should >_not_ go to Goliath (and not to Crafty either as Bob has stated) >so he is making nonsense points to say it should. It is ludicrous to claim that Crafty is commercial. Crafty is available under the GPL. This means that anyone can sell it, but the source must be available for nothing. As long as Bob is not receiving significant money for it, it is not commercial. The professional/amateur distinction is always fuzzy. There are lots of amateurs who have taken money for their programs, but are still considered amateur by the ICCA. Crafty is not one of these. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.