Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 22:59:23 08/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2001 at 19:18:24, Uri Blass wrote: >The idea is that programmers who earns more money should pay more in order to >participate. The whole part of 'does he earn anything' is so icy I specifically avoid it. If you don't earn much by selling your program then that is _your_ problem and does not make you less of an pro. >I think that in this case deciding that he needs to pay more 400$ as entry fee >is unfair. Nonsense. The amateurs dont earn ANYTHING and they ALSO have to pay. >I think that a more fair method of deciding about entry fees should say that >programmers should pay 100$+ 1% of the total money that they earned from >selling their program in the last year. And disclose their earnings? Not gona happen... >I think that if he does not earn from his program for at least one year it >should be defined as an amteur. No. He has already benefitted from the pro status and this will show in the program. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.