Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: For Bob, chessbase claims your prog being commercially sold

Author: Tony Werten

Date: 00:21:52 08/29/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 28, 2001 at 11:46:37, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:

>On August 28, 2001 at 07:19:32, Tony Werten wrote:
>
>>On August 28, 2001 at 06:20:21, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On August 28, 2001 at 05:48:58, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>>
>>>i think you're thinking too deep. he simply wanted to get rid of
>>>the questions why gromit could get a world title if it is getting sold
>>>on the young talents cdrom.
>>
>>It's not the selling of the new talents cd that should be the point. You can
>>argue that the programmer hardly get anything from it.
>>
>>Follow this link and you have some real arguments why Gromit is commercial.
>>
>>http://213.191.70.91/shopd/index.html
>>
>>Tony
>
>I shouldn't consider someone being a professional chess programmer just because
>he'd earned a - more or less - minor amount of money years ago. (At least so I
>suspect)
>Profession means to me that you are getting a substantial part of your income
>through this. This is definitely not true for Gromit.
>
>Well, the usual discussion! The border between professional and amateur isn't
>exactly defined.

I thought that was the reason they introduced the semi-professional category,
for the  non-amateurs.

Tony

>
>In the wmccc event, a very natural definition could be, that everybody who'd
>payed the large entry fee for professionells, is a profi; the others are
>amateurs. Again, Gromit would fall into the amateur league.
>
>Uli
>
>>
>>>
>>>the easiest way to say that this doesn't matter is by saying that all
>>>programs get sold.
>>>
>>>that's how he explained things in the wrong way IMHO.
>>>
>>>>On August 28, 2001 at 04:39:54, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Now i don't care about gromit in this story, didn't even want to do
>>>>>effort to translate the stuff, but the ANSWER from Andreas can mean
>>>>>2 things
>>>>>   a) Bob can claim money from chessbase
>>>>>   b) Andreas is lying
>>>>
>>>>c) Andreas doesn't like that it is claimed the title should
>>>>_not_ go to Goliath (and not to Crafty either as Bob has stated)
>>>>so he is making nonsense points to say it should.
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>GCP



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.