Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:35:41 08/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2001 at 01:59:23, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 28, 2001 at 19:18:24, Uri Blass wrote: > >>The idea is that programmers who earns more money should pay more in order to >>participate. > >The whole part of 'does he earn anything' is so icy I specifically >avoid it. If you don't earn much by selling your program then that >is _your_ problem and does not make you less of an pro. > >>I think that in this case deciding that he needs to pay more 400$ as entry fee >>is unfair. > >Nonsense. The amateurs dont earn ANYTHING and they ALSO have to pay. Yes but it is not fair to ask freom professional to lose more money than the amatuer. I have no problem if they pay more money then the amteurs that is different than losing more money than the amatuers. > >>I think that a more fair method of deciding about entry fees should say that >>programmers should pay 100$+ 1% of the total money that they earned from >>selling their program in the last year. > >And disclose their earnings? Not gona happen... It is enough for me if they tell their earning only to the organizers. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.