Author: Peter Berger
Date: 10:24:23 08/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2001 at 12:43:59, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >It was no real point. Just another remark. I think, we agree in all points. >I probably just would formulate it a bit different. I think, it is pure tactics, >not so much king safety. The KS values should give hints, I think. But only the >tactics can really solve this. > >I guess many engines may find a 0.0 score after Kd6 and after Ke8 for a while. >The one, that is tried first, will be choosen. If an engine smells a bit trouble >after Kd6 early (say slightly negative score), of course Ke8 will be choosen. >Then eventually a big fail low comes. An engine, that chooses to solve the fail >low first, before trying other moves, will need lots of time for this as well. >All a matter of a few centi pawns in evaluation. The same may be true for >finding f3 after Ke8. > >Regards, >Dieter So you _did_ have a point here and I am happy I asked :). Thanks for this interesting and convincing explanation. pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.