Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: NEW DEFINITION of Amateur, Semi-pro and Pro in game-development

Author: Theo van der Storm

Date: 13:41:54 08/29/01

Go up one level in this thread


On August 29, 2001 at 05:37:17, Ulrich Tuerke wrote:

>>1. Amateur:
>>   You cannot be an amateur if you earn money by the selling of your program,
>>   (that would be a commercial interest), so the amateurs cannot be receiving
>>   money from the game-company...
>
>How about programmers who had once (say 2 years ago) obtained an amount of money
>for publishing their program (i guess young talents fall into this). Do they
>have to be non-Amateurs for the rest of their lives ?
>
>I'm sorry, but I think it's not possible to make a clear and fair
>classification.
I think it is possible.
Even if my text is still not good anough and needs a lawyer to fix it.
Here goes my 1,5ct worth:

amateur:
A programmer is an amateur if he is not a professional,
nor an employd scientist involved with game-theory at any time
and has not received money for his game-development in the last 12 months.

semi-professional:
A programmer is a semi-professional if he is not an amateur nor a professional.

professional:
A programmer is a professional if during any full year his income
from game-development has been bigger than any other part of his income.

So:
Once a professional, always a professional.
A professional in Chess-programming must also be considered a
professional in Amazons-programming.
Switching between amateur and semi-professional is possible
depending on the circumstances.

> IMHO, one should omit this nonsense completely.
IMHO,   one should omit this needless frustration completely.
As a matter of fact in the Dutch Computer-chess championship we
never had such a distinction and I'm not proposing to introduce it either.
So my text is just an advice in case ICCA does continue on this road.

>Regards, Uli
>...
>>I feel the definitions need mending. My internet connection is about
>>to break due to idle(eh?) time, so I cannot give my proposed exact
>>definitions yet. Maybe later.
>>
>>Theo
Theo van der Storm (I'm back)



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.