Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 16:44:19 08/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2001 at 19:25:02, Roy Eassa wrote: >On August 29, 2001 at 18:45:30, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>On August 29, 2001 at 18:29:58, Roy Eassa wrote: >> >>>On August 29, 2001 at 16:25:21, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>[D]r4r1k/4bppb/2n1p2p/p1n1P3/1p1p1BNP/3P1NP1/qP2QPB1/2RR2K1 w - - bm Ng5; c0 >>>>"Weinstein-Elyoseph, Israel, 1992"; id "Nolot.9, src=?"; >>> >>> >>>OK, Ng5 is the solution. Could somebody please supply a bit of analysis to back >>>it up? >> >> >>Gambit Tiger 2.0 on 1.2 GHz Athlon, analysis mode, with me making and taking >>back various moves and looking at the evaluations (my annotations): >> >>Date: 29/8/2001 >>White: Roy Eassa >>Black: Gambit Tiger 2.0 >> >>1. Ng5 >> >>(1. Rxc5? Bxc5 2. Rc1 a4! 3. Rxc5 a3 4. Bc1 Rac8 is good for black.) >> >>1... hxg5 2. Bxg5 Na4 3. Nf6! Bg6 4. Bxc6 Nc3 5. Qf3 Nxd1 6. Bxa8 Nxf2 7. Kxf2 >>Qxb2+ 8. Kg1 gxf6 9. exf6 Bd6 10. Be4 is winning for white. >> >>Anybody else? > > >With help from Fritz 6 (instead of Tiger): > >1.Ng5 > >[1.Rxc5? Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4! 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Bc1 Rac8 5.Ng5 hxg5 6.Bxc6 Qb1 7.bxa3 bxa3 >8.Kh2 a2 9.Bb2 gxh4-+] > >1...hxg5 2.Bxg5 Rac8 3.Bxc6 Bxd3 4.Qf3! Bxg5 5.hxg5 Qxb2 6.Rxc5 Bh7 7.Kg2 Kg8 >8.Nh6+! gxh6 9.gxh6+- Same, but updated with new variations, including black not capturing on g5: 1.Ng5 [1.Rxc5 Bxc5 2.Rc1 a4! 3.Rxc5 a3 4.Bc1 Rac8 5.Ng5 hxg5 6.Bxc6 Qb1 7.bxa3 bxa3 8.Kh2 a2 9.Bb2 gxh4-+] 1...hxg5 [1...Bf5 2.Ne4 Bxe4 3.Bxe4 Rac8 4.Nxh6 Nxe4 5.Qxe4 Qa4 (5...Qb3 6.Ng4 Rfd8 unclear) 6.Ng4 unclear] 2.Bxg5 Rac8 3.Bxc6 Bxg5 [3...Rxc6 4.Bxe7 Rfc8 5.Nh6! Bg6 6.h5 Bxd3 7.Qg4±; 3...Bxd3 4.Qf3! Bxg5 5.hxg5 Qxb2 6.Rxc5± Bh7 7.Kg2 Kg8 8.Nh6+! gxh6 9.gxh6+-] 4.Rxc5 Be7 5.Rcc1 Qb3 black has small advantage
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.