Author: Jouni Uski
Date: 00:03:39 08/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2001 at 02:15:53, Derrick Daniels wrote: > > > Ok, forget about the hardware improments of the last 9 years, how much better >is Deep Fritz or Tiger 14 then Genius 2, 3 ?? I have Heard Bob hyatt say that >little improvement has been made. From a Chess Amatuer Point of view, seems to >me much progress has been made, although genius was strong, it tended to make >rediculous moves and was extremely materialistic, it couldn't sacrifice material >for positional reasons like modern programs, or is my thinking corrupted by >hyperbole? It does seem that today's programs do play much stronger and better >chess then 1994, what do you think? I looked at SSDF list and found one answer: Genius 5 is rated exactly as Mchess 8, which is 2477 on AMD 450. Genius 3 is 21 points weaker e.g. about 2456. This is quite exactly 200 points under DeepFritz and Tiger! Jouni
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.