Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:28:31 08/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2001 at 04:16:17, Mark Young wrote: >On August 30, 2001 at 02:15:53, Derrick Daniels wrote: > >> >> >> Ok, forget about the hardware improments of the last 9 years, how much better >>is Deep Fritz or Tiger 14 then Genius 2, 3 ?? I have Heard Bob hyatt say that >>little improvement has been made. From a Chess Amatuer Point of view, seems to >>me much progress has been made, although genius was strong, it tended to make >>rediculous moves and was extremely materialistic, it couldn't sacrifice material >>for positional reasons like modern programs, or is my thinking corrupted by >>hyperbole? It does seem that today's programs do play much stronger and better >>chess then 1994, what do you think? > >We don't need to go back that far, I will play some games against Junior 4.6 vs >Chess Tiger and post the results. I have no games between these two programs but >I am sure Chess Tiger will have no problems winning. I doubt if Junior4.6 is better than Genius3. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.