Author: Mark Young
Date: 07:51:23 08/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2001 at 10:29:35, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On August 30, 2001 at 10:20:12, Mark Young wrote: > >>You will answer it for my Bob! Here is your Quote and the full text. > >Nothing in the quoted text supports your own "little progress" interpretation. >There is "small number of "revolutionary" ideas", "slow, methodical progress" >and "incremental changes". All of which underlines slow and steady quite well >according to my understanding of the English language. But what do I know, I'm a >foreigner. I will Quote again for the foreigners: "Part of the progress has been due to incremental changes to chess engines/evaluations/etc, part has been due to the hardware speed advances. Probably more of the latter than the former, if the truth is known..." Bob states clearly from the above that he thinks "if the truth is known" Micro Chess computer advancement is more due to hardware speed or faster computers. Less to due with better chess programs. Well we can test this theory, Since we can run the old programs on modern hardware and play them against the best programs of today. Then we will see just how much or less hardware has to do with micro computer chess advancement. > >Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.