Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 09:47:28 05/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On May 13, 1998 at 06:12:00, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >How can a program like Fritz5 which loses normally to all those programs >can get on top? I never saw any games where Fritz 5 would lose "normally" to anything. Quite the contrary in autoplayed games, manual games like the ones played by Mark Young at ICC... All posted. >How can Rebel9 get stronger than 8, considering that the only >4 things changed are interface,few extensions to solve some tricks, >BOOKLEARNING, and with capital letters BOOK. Come on, you said the same about Rebel 8, remember? Look, this is a quotation from December 4th 1996: _____________ In <01bbe111$a3c4d4e0$f3ece0c2@10.0.1.1> "Enrique Irazoqui" <enir@lix.intercom.es> writes: >> Vincent Diepeveen <vdiepeve@cs.ruu.nl> wrote > >> What is your opinion about the Rebel super killerbook. >> I played a rapid-game Rebel-Genius3. Rebel in book: far over 20 moves. >> Genius in book: around 10 moves.> >> After his book Genius3 played: ... Qd8-b6 followed by Qb6xb2??>>Dear Vincent, >>Could you post this game? I am looking for killer lines in programs and so >far I did not find this one. I aborted the game, but i'll look up the line for you this evening. ______________________ 500 evenings passed... and still no proof of Rebel 8 or 9 owing that much to BOOK in capital letters. So Rebel must be getting stronger because of something else, don't you think? Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.