Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:28:53 08/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2001 at 14:25:39, Scott Gasch wrote: >On August 30, 2001 at 14:07:50, Dann Corbit wrote: > >> >>Dumb question: >>Why not let them all have their own move generator and just share the hash >>table? > >I guess that's one approach -- run them as seperate processes in seperate >virtual address spaces and simply share the hash table. I was planning on using >simple threads in the same address space though. Not sure why, seems more >straightforward to me... I think threads are better too, but you can still have separate data structures for your move generators. Besides which, you would not have to used shared memory for your hash table -- ordinary malloc() would be fine instead if you use a single process with multiple threads
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.