Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 11:06:24 05/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
>Posted by Vincent Diepeveen on May 14, 1998 at 08:18:47: >In Reply to: Re: Deep Blue--Part III posted by Ed Schröder on May 13, 1998 >at 11:16:01: >On May 13, 1998 at 11:16:01, Ed Schröder wrote: >>Posted by Vincent Diepeveen on May 13, 1998 at 06:12:00: >>In Reply to: Re: Deep Blue--Part III posted by Dave Gomboc on May 12, >>1998 >>at 21:31:19: >>>KK kup was fake. Diep got black in the only 2 important games. >>>Just 2 games. >>>And Diep got outbooked by both programs. >>>Game against Rebel it was directly lost. Diep's horrible in French. >>>Just look at ICC the % of wins of Diep in French. >>Then why play French? > >>Because Diep plays the French bad the KK-KUP-I was a fake? > >>As far as I remember you were the one claiming to have the best >>analysis program in the world and exactly THIS was the reason >>that KK organized the first KK cup. No comments Vincent? >>>2500 SSDF says nothing. >>Is Diep better then? No comments Vincent? >>>How can Rebel9 get stronger than 8, considering that the only >>>4 things changed are interface,few extensions to solve some tricks, >>>BOOKLEARNING, and with capital letters BOOK. >>Any proof of that? >Book different, and booklearning. Of course. >I received from Jan games where Rebel repeated game after game, >so we know that your booklearning is aggressive too. True, an obligation if you want to survive on SSDF. >Exactly same score at same depth. >Same evaluation at same depth. >Faster finding tricks sometimes, needing more nodes for every ply. >So engine mainly the same, selectivity either less, or more extensions. >Probably that last, you're the one knowing it, your explanation? On the Rebel Home Page you find the main improvements from Rebel8 to Rebel9. >>>No doubt that when i send my program to Sweden that i will >>>have played some hundreds ot auto232 games too (i'm only >>>having a Pentium pro 200 and a laptop 133, so i can't produce >>>thousands of games like the pro's). >>Like to help you. Just send Diep and I will test it for you on >>40/2:00. Diep is auto232 compatible or? No answer? Pity, would love to find out about Diep. >DID EVERYONE MISS IMPORTANT CONCLUSION >OF MY MSG? IS EVERYONE BELIEVING DB JUST FOR 6 GAMES, >WITH BUNCHES OF BAD MOVES, WHERE I ACCORDING TO THE >ONE I REPLIED ON NEED AN ELORATING IN SWEDEN BEFORE >HE BELIEVES ME? What are you implying then? Not another cheat theory I hope. >Of course i understand very well that Ed replied to what i wrote, i >didn't expect different. ???? >In the past i repeatedly proposed Ed and Jeroen (who asks always for >a version of Diep) to exchange version of Diep for version of Rebel. ???? Sorry Vincent, I can't remember this. >They didn't want this to happen. See above. Just sent Diep and I will test it for you. And you tell me your address for a copy of Rebel9. - Ed - >Greetings, >Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.