Author: Pham Minh Tri
Date: 15:47:12 08/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2001 at 08:50:52, Mark Young wrote: >It has been suggested here that programs have made little progress in the last >10 years other then hardware speed. Here is the list of top programs 6 years >ago. Does anyone really think a program of 4, 6 or 10 years ago running on >modern but equal hardware would have a chance of beating a Junior 7, Deep Fritz, >Chess Tiger in a match. I think someone is pulling our legs. > >If the suggestion that programs have not progressed much is correct, then we >have been suckered by all programmers who offer us so called better and stronger >version of their programs. I don't tell about the matches between the old and new engines (no experience), but I think almost all new ones should be better to against human. However, recent good players have much more experience to beat computers than others of 5 years ago. As a result, again, we have no evidence of progress of computer chess. What do you think?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.