Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:56:04 08/30/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2001 at 17:38:05, Uri Blass wrote: > >No >There is a definition of a micro and it is not about speed. >using more than one processor is not a micro by definition and the meaning of >the WMCCC was always championship of programs who use only one processor. > I assume you know that the ICCA came out of the dark ages this year and allowed multiprocessors in the WMCCC event? >I disagree that Deep Fritz needs to beat kramnik in order to prove that it is >better than deeper blue. > >The conditions are not the same and kramnik gets the program before the match >when kasparov had no information about deeper blue. > >Note that the claim that deep Fritz is better than deeper blue is supported by >evidence. Please cite the evidence. I have given plenty of evidence to the contrary. Deep Thought performed better against human GM players than Deep Fritz has done to date. And deep thought was but a tiny part of what Deep Blue 2 was. > >You can say that the evidence does not convince you but it is a fact that deeper >blue was only 2-3 times faster than Deep Fritz in finding similiar lines >in few positions that comparison was possible. > >I investigated only a small part of the positions of deeper blue-kasparov and >I am going to change my mind only if I find significant number of cases when >Deeper blue is at least 100 times faster then top programs in seeing similiar >thing(the full main line does not need to be the same but at least the first >plies in the main line need to be the same). > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.