Author: leonid
Date: 05:46:06 09/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 2001 at 23:50:50, Angrim wrote: >On August 31, 2001 at 06:16:57, leonid wrote: > >>[D]2r2k2/2pqqr2/1nq2bb1/qnQQQQqq/q1Q2Q1q/2Q2Q2/2R2R2/2B2K2 w - - >> >>Please indicate your result. >> >>Thanks, >>Leonid. > >older pn2 code: >proved that move e5xe7 wins, 9 turns >PN2:3496323 evals, 74810 expands, 17.28 seconds > >newest pn2 code: >proved that move c5xe7 wins, 9 turns >PN2:14645477 evals, 361828 expands, 84.17 seconds > >newest pn-search: >proved that move e5xe7 wins, 9 turns >PN:1810301 evals, 41852 expands, 10.39 seconds > >one downside to selective searchers: very unstable behavior. In >all cases the search settled on a favorite move in the first second >or so, then spent most of the remaining time proving that it won. >It seems that e5xe7 is simpler to prove than c5xe7, so the 5:1 speed >difference may well have resulted from a change in move ordering. Hi, Angrim! As I see you found three solutions and all (if I read correctly) 10 moves deep. It is actually mate in 10 and you found mate in shortest way. I proved that position is mate in 10 by searching the first 9 moves by brute force and mate move by 10 moves deep. Your time is excellent, for sure. Mine was 15 seconds for selective, for first mate. Celeron 600. No hash. Cheers, Leonid. >Angrim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.