Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 10:32:20 09/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2001 at 04:04:21, Harald Faber wrote: >On August 31, 2001 at 19:14:12, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>After a successful 1st place at the WMCCC for Amir with his excellent program >>Deep Junior and for Stefan Meyer with Shredder 5.32, it must be hard to admit >>that when pitted against Gambit Tiger II in a series of 40 games such as in the >>SSDF, Gambit Tiger II is proving to be stronger than both when using comparable >>Hardwares. >> >>Pichard. > >SSDF is playing different hardware AND versions than what played at WCCC in >Maastricht. Take a close look at the hardware used in the SSDF both programs are pitted using the same Hardware. Now that is another reason why the WMCCC is so unsignificant, since all the programs are not using a standard hardware for single processor and for the one competing under Multi processors. Plus we all understand that all programmers bring their latest version to this match. That is exactly the point that I'm making here, the SSDF is the best way to get an idea of how good a program is. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.