Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 12:59:22 09/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2001 at 05:41:46, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>On September 01, 2001 at 00:59:06, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>If you are not using Windows 95 anymore, did you try to understand why you could
>>not use it anymore? What about the OS of two years from now that will FORCE you
>>to throw your A1400 to the trash and buy a 3GHz computer? If you could still be
>>using or you are using Win95, what about Windows 3.10? Can you mention good
>>technical reasons for not using it anymore?
>
>It's unstable, it doesn't _truly_ multitask, it's a thin GUI over a flimsy DOS
>core, it manages memory worse than poorly, it's completely insecure, and it has
>to rebooted practically daily just to keep it running at a decent level.
>
>Do you want more reasons? :)
You have perfectly described Windows 98 and windows Millenium. ;)
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.