Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 14:31:01 09/01/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2001 at 15:45:12, Uri Blass wrote: >I believe that you are wrong. > >Deeper search without singular extensions is always important >Deeper blue could not see the move Qe3 in the pv against kasparov >when top programs of today can see it > >programs change their mind also at long time control because >deep search helps them to discover new things. > >I have examples from my correspondence games >when Deep Fritz changes it's mind after many hours >to a better positional move because of deep search >and I believe that it could not see it with singular extensions. This whole post is a guess. Why do you believe that singular extension would hurt this position? What evidence do you have that DB would have seen the perpetual without SE? Why do you think that SE hurts positional play? Which programs find Qe3, and do they use SE? If you say none of them use it, how do you know? bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.