Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: some results of Deep Fritz on the nolot test suite

Author: Peter McKenzie

Date: 00:46:19 09/02/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 01, 2001 at 03:06:36, Uri Blass wrote:

>New position
>r4rk1/pp1n1p1p/1nqP2p1/2b1P1B1/4NQ2/1B3P2/PP2K2P/2R5 w - - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Deep Fritz:
>1.Bf6 Qb5+ 2.Ke1 Nxf6 3.Nxf6+ Kg7 4.Nh5+ gxh5 5.Qf6+ Kg8 6.Qg5+ Kh8
>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 16/46   00:58:08  2202882kN
>1.Rxc5!
>  =  (-0.12)   Depth: 16/47   01:24:52  3194479kN
>1.Rxc5! Qxc5 2.Nxc5 Nxc5 3.Bh6 Nxb3 4.axb3 Nd7 5.Bxf8 Rxf8 6.Qe4 b6

interesting PV first up wouldn't you say?
It seems that Fritz has already totally refuted 1.Rxc5 Nxc5

>  +-  (2.88)   Depth: 16/47   01:31:32  3406222kN
>1.Rxc5--
>  +-  (2.56)   Depth: 17/46   01:37:46  3618726kN
>1.Rxc5--
>  +-  (2.56)   Depth: 17/47   01:46:03  3887272kN
>1.Rxc5!
>  +-  (2.88)   Depth: 18/47   02:29:13  5333982kN
>1.Rxc5! Qxc5 2.Nxc5 Nxc5 3.Bh6 Nxb3 4.axb3 Nd7 5.Bxf8 Rxf8 6.Qe4 b6
>  +-  (3.00)   Depth: 18/48   02:55:01  6197066kN
>1.Rxc5 Qxc5 2.Nxc5 Nxc5 3.Bh6 Nxb3 4.axb3 Nd7 5.Bxf8 Rxf8 6.Qd4 b6
>  +-  (3.09)   Depth: 19/49   04:38:34  9702846kN
>
>(blass, tel-aviv 31.08.2001)
>
>New position
>r1b1kb1r/1p1n1ppp/p2ppn2/6BB/2qNP3/2N5/PPP2PPP/R2Q1RK1 w kq - 0 1
>
>Analysis by Deep Fritz:
>
>1.Be2 Qc7 2.a4 b6 3.Bh5 Nxh5 4.Qxh5 Ne5 5.Rfd1 Nc4 6.Ra2 Bd7
>  ²  (0.41)   Depth: 15/37   00:07:27  292695kN
>1.Bf3!
>  ²  (0.44)   Depth: 15/39   00:11:07  430472kN
>1.Bf3 Be7 2.Qd2 Rb8 3.a3 b5 4.Rfd1 Qc7 5.b4 Ne5 6.Be2 Bb7
>  ²  (0.38)   Depth: 16/43   00:31:03  1060753kN
>1.Nxe6!
>  ²  (0.41)   Depth: 16/43   00:49:03  1789893kN
>1.Nxe6! Qxe6 2.Nd5 Kd8 3.Bg4 Qe5 4.f4 Qxb2 5.Bxd7 Bxd7 6.Rb1 Qxa2

it seems this is just a partial PV?
Doesn't Fritz print the whole PV?

>  ²  (0.66)   Depth: 16/43   00:54:29  1961696kN
>1.Nxe6 Qxe6 2.Nd5 Kd8 3.Bg4 Qe5 4.f4 Qxb2 5.Bxd7 Bxd7 6.Rb1 Qxa2
>  ±  (0.81)   Depth: 17/42   01:07:42  2373560kN
>
>(blass, tel-aviv 01.09.2001)
>
...
>
>The claim that the position is the easiest position of the nolot test does not
>seem convincing

Yes, it is tough for LambChop.  I'm not sure how some programs are solving this
problem very quickly.

>
>Deep Fritz has the illusion of solving it at depth 15 but it did not solve it.
>
>Even after Rxf7 Rxf7 Bxf7+ Kxf7 Deep Fritz has problems to see a positive score
>and cannot see positive score at depth 15.
>
>Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.