Author: Chessfun
Date: 11:56:45 09/02/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2001 at 08:59:43, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 02, 2001 at 07:59:22, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On September 02, 2001 at 05:10:46, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On September 02, 2001 at 04:53:31, Steve Maughan wrote: >>> >>>>IMHO, if it's tactics you're trying to spot then you should use: Fritz, Goliath, >>>>ChessMaster possibly Nimzo. For positional analysis, Shredder, Junior 7 and >>>>Tiger. For all round play I like Gambit Tiger and Junior 7. >>>> >>>>Steve >>> >>>I believe that Deep Fritz is the best. >>>I believe that Deep Fritz is the best in tactics except finding >>>mates(chessmaster is the best in this task) >>> >>>I believe that Deep fritz is in similiar level to other engines in >>>positional understanding and there are cases when it is better and >>>cases when it is worse. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Uri, >>So you don't agree about Golliath. >> >>And you say that Gambit Tiger is not exactly the very best in tactics alone or >>in positional understanding alone, even if it will top the next ssdf list (i.e. >>wins slightly more games)? >>What then is the additional ingredient that (it seems) GT might have? >>S.Taylor > >1)If gambittiger can top the ssdf then I may change my mind. Looking at it's current score v Junior 7 and Shredder 5.32 it's totally possible it will top the next list. But why should it's position relative to #1 or #2 on the SSDF influence your opinion?. >2)I believe that one of the advantages of gambittiger relative to >Deep Fritz is better time management. Please explain as this is something I always felt opposite about. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.