Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:28:59 09/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2001 at 02:40:13, Michel Langeveld wrote: >On September 03, 2001 at 08:51:36, Michel Langeveld wrote: > >>On September 03, 2001 at 08:22:58, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On September 03, 2001 at 06:34:44, Michel Langeveld wrote: >>> >>>>19-> 4376:05 0.29 1. Nxh6 Bg6 2. Ne1 Rac8 3. h5 Bh7 4. >>>> Ng4 a4 5. Nf6 a3 6. Nxh7 axb2 7. Rc2 >>>> Kxh7 8. Rxb2 Qa5 9. Bxc6 Rxc6 10. Nc2 >>>> b3 11. Nxd4 >>> >>> >>>Michel, how many total nodes were searched? And that's amazing, 72 hours! >>> >>> >>>Slate >> >>I let it run instantly (with searchtime=999999 or something like that) >> >>My Crafty searches on a 733 Mhz about 500.000 nodes/sec. >>So the total nodes is about: 500.000 x 3600 x 73 = 129.600.000.000 nodes > >This is a crafty analysis of the position after the move Ng5. >According to the score this move is better than Nf6 and Nxh6. >So solved? :-) > >20 756:50 0.45 1. ... hxg5 2. Bxg5 Rac8 3. Bxc6 Bxg5 > 4. Rxc5 Be7 5. Rcc1 Bf5 6. Nh2 Bh3 > 7. g4 a4 8. Ra1 Qb3 9. Bxa4 Qd5 10. > f3 Rc5 11. Re1 No one possible problem is that crafty evaluation is not symmetric. Another problem is that I suspect that you did not analyze the position after Nxh6 or Nf6 to the same depth. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.