Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:06:51 09/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2001 at 06:44:43, Sune Larsson wrote:
>On September 04, 2001 at 06:13:45, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On September 04, 2001 at 05:53:35, Peter Berger wrote:
>>
>>>On September 04, 2001 at 04:39:13, Eduard Nemeth wrote:
>>>
>>>>After Fritz 6c , I played today this "two knights" opening, against Tiger 14
>>>>on Blitz 30' Level.
>>>>
>>>>But, Tiger 14 losing in pawn endgame! :-(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>[Event "Stufe=Blitz:30'."]
>>>>[Site "?"]
>>>>[Date "2001.??.??"]
>>>>[Round "?"]
>>>>[White "Chess Tiger 14.0"]
>>>>[Black "Nemeth,Eduard"]
>>>>[ECO "C56"]
>>>>[Result "0-1"]
>>>>
>>>>1. e4 {0} e5 {2} 2. Nf3 {0} Nc6 {2} 3. Bc4 {0} Nf6 {3}
>>>>4. d4 {0} exd4 {1} 5. O-O {0} Nxe4 {3} 6. Re1 {0} d5 {1}
>>>>7. Bxd5 {0} Qxd5 {1} 8. Nc3 {0} Qh5 {1} 9. Nxe4 {0} Be7 {3}
>>>>10. Bg5 {0} Bg4 {1} 11. Bxe7 {0.70/12 30} Bxf3 {4} 12. Nf6+
>>>>{0.76/12 34} gxf6 {3} 13. Bxf6+ {0.00/13 32} Kd7 {3}
>>>>14. Qxf3 {-0.19/13 33} Qxf3 {4} 15. gxf3 {-0.22/15 37}
>>>>Rhg8+ {3} 16. Kf1 {-0.22/15 60} Rg6 {3} 17. Bh4 {-0.06/14
>>>>68} f5 {31} 18. Rad1 {-0.04/13 54} Rf8 {81} 19. f4 {0.14/13
>>>>46} Rd6 {22} 20. f3 {0.12/13 34} Re8 {18} 21. Rxe8 {0.36/15
>>>>34} Kxe8 {3} 22. Bf2 {0.32/14 47} Nb4 {36} 23. Rxd4
>>>>{0.26/16 53} Rxd4 {3} 24. Bxd4 {-0.04/15 7} Nxc2 {10}
>>>>25. Bxa7 {-0.14/17 56} b6 {3} 26. a4 {-0.04/19 55} Ne3+
>>>>{13} 27. Ke2 {-0.08/18 37} Nd5 {2} 28. a5 {-0.04/17 40}
>>>>bxa5 {9} 29. Be3 {-0.14/18 25} Nxe3 {4} 30. Kxe3 {-0.16/18
>>>>7} c5 {2} 31. Kd3 {-0.14/21 31} Kd7 {2} 32. Kc4 {-0.18/20
>>>>44} Kc6 {3} 33. b3 {-1.80/22 125} Kb6 {10} 34. h3 {-1.80/21
>>>>25} h6 {18} 35. h4 {-2.06/23 151} h5 {2} 36. Kd3 {-3.92/23
>>>>200} Kb5 {3} 37. Kd2 {-25.93/20 33} c4 {7} 38. Kc3
>>>>{-13.71/17 18} cxb3 {6} 0-1
>>>>
>>>
>>>Hi Eduard,
>>>
>>>it seems to me your analysis is not to the point here although your intro (
>>>mentioning the pawn endgame)was .
>>>
>>>At move 24 white's position is already bad - 25. Bxa7 ?!looks somehow ugly to a
>>>human's eye but what should the general rule be to avoid it ? Tiger sees that it
>>>can free the bishop again without problems so it is trading a pair of pawns on
>>>the queenside and destroying the black majority - not too bad a general idea.
>>>
>>>The real problem is 29. Be3 ?? ( and I suspect this one will be hard to avoid
>>>for many programs ) trading into the lost pawn endgame . Sth like Kd3 instead
>>>might have been good enough for a draw still.
>>>
>>>pete
>
>snip
>
>
>>Tiger14 is better and can see Nxe3 in the pv but it cannot avoid Be3.
>>
>>Uri
>
> I don't get it. This is Tiger's analyse after move 28, and 8 sec needed
> to avoid 29.Be3?
>
>
> Chess Tiger 14.0 - Nemeth,E
>4k3/B1p4p/8/p2n1p2/5P2/5P2/1P2K2P/8 w - - 0 1
<snipped>
>Analysis by Gambit Tiger 2.0:
I did not check this analysis but the analysis is by gambittiger2 when the game
was played by tiger14.
I did not try gambit2 because I assumed that there is no difference between
gambit2 and tiger14 in the endgame.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.