Author: Adam Oellermann
Date: 09:34:50 09/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2001 at 12:31:45, Adam Oellermann wrote: >On September 03, 2001 at 19:29:03, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On September 03, 2001 at 19:23:45, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>You can't even do math right dude! >> >>Here's what you said, and what's on Ace's Hardware: >> >>>106k nps at the dual Xeon 1.7Ghz >>>120k nps at the dual AMD 1.2 MP >> >>(106 / 1.7) * 2 = 12, 125 > 120 >> >>Where exactly did I screw up the math? >> >>And how are these numbers supposed to prove that the K7/1.2 is faster than the >>P4/2.0 anyway? >> >>Personally, I'd rather trust benchmarks that people besides you use (i.e., not >>Diep) that involve the actual chips in question. The Tom's Hardware article does >>exactly that. And the K7 didn't win a single one of those tests. >> >>-Tom > >Actually, it did win one or two by very tiny margins, but they were trivial >benchmarks anyway in my view. > >- Adam Sorry, my mistake. It was actually the 1.4GHz processor that benched slightly ahead of the P4 in the Unreal Tournament tests.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.