Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 13:48:47 09/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2001 at 16:05:07, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 04, 2001 at 15:27:13, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: > >>On September 04, 2001 at 14:54:56, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On September 04, 2001 at 14:38:29, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>Q: I asked GM Kramnik if the final version of Fritz 7 is not given to him will >>>>the match still be held. >>>> >>>>A: GM Kramnik said "The match will be held rain or snow" >>>> >>>>"However the fact that i still don't have the final version of Fritz puts me >>>>into disadvantage" >>> >>>The fact that Deep Fritz has not the final version of kramnik and even >>>not a version of kramnik from 2000 puts Fritz into a bigger >>>disadvantage. >> >>Not true, they do have a whole collection of games played by Kramnik >>and the whole repertoire of his openings with virtues and (very few if >>any)defects. > >They have only games of a previous version of kramnik and kramnik >has also games of previous version of Fritz in the ssdf games. c'mon! Kramnik did not have brain transplant. Learning does not count, both DF and Kramnik can learn. >>Kasparov made the same stupid mistake, allowing a match against an opponent >>of which he has no knowledge and nothing on the contract to get a rematch. >>He was so sure he would win... > >I agree that deeper blue had an advantage against kasparov but I >prefer to see if machines can beat kramnik under the same situation >that kasparov played before playing under better conditions. > >I think that better conditions should be allowed >only after kramnik lose one match. > >I suggest the following: >match 1:kramnik only knows that he plays against the machine and >is going to know the name of the machine only after the match. > >The machine cna be Fritz,shredder,Junior or some union of them when >another program is used to decide which machine to trust. > >If kramnik is losing then match 2: >kramnik against the same machine that is not avaiable to the public but >only after this union proves itself in matches against >other super GM's like anand and kramnik can use the games >to learn the machine. > >If kramnik is losing again then match 3 is going to >happen after this machine becomes >commercial and the programmers have rights to change >only the oprning book. > >If kramniks wins again then a 4th match when the programmers are >allowed to change nothing. > >Uri This is not a scientific contest, it is sporting competition! Of course, Kramnik would not mind if you give him 1M dollars each time though... Regards, Miguel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.