Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 22:08:26 09/04/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2001 at 19:29:03, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On September 03, 2001 at 19:23:45, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>You can't even do math right dude! > >Here's what you said, and what's on Ace's Hardware: > >>106k nps at the dual Xeon 1.7Ghz >>120k nps at the dual AMD 1.2 MP > >(106 / 1.7) * 2 = 12, 125 > 120 > >Where exactly did I screw up the math? Before any wiseguy tries to give TK a bad time about his math, I just want to point out that the 12 is an obvious typo and that 125 was intended there. > >And how are these numbers supposed to prove that the K7/1.2 is faster than the >P4/2.0 anyway? > >Personally, I'd rather trust benchmarks that people besides you use (i.e., not >Diep) that involve the actual chips in question. The Tom's Hardware article does >exactly that. And the K7 didn't win a single one of those tests. > >-Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.