Author: Slater Wold
Date: 01:53:40 09/05/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2001 at 04:04:14, derrick gatewood wrote: >actually, though I am not going to make a prediction about the strength of the >program, I will say a little about hardware plans for the next ten years. >Though it is a little early, market demand will mean everything and right now >Intel and especially AMD do not really need to make faster chips. However, >Intel has plans within the 10 year product line to release a 10ghz processor for >desktop computers, which is a far cry from what is being predicted in the >1.0thz. Also, isnt it the smaller the die size, the lower consumption of >electricity? So, it is my understand as we get to smaller technologies, top >the point of atomic computing, electricity use will be very insignicant, while >computing power will be incredible. There are no plans, however, to release any >atomic computing solutions in the nears future though =/ I was simply stating what has happened in the past, and that is, CPU speed doubles every 18 months. It has since computers were invented, all the way up until now. Why would it stop here? Don't try to tell me that going from a Pentium 100mhz to a Pentium 1000mhz is easier than going from a Pentium 1000mhz to a Pentium 2000mhz. Or from 2000mhz to 3000mhz. That simply is not true, and is not acceptable. Thoughts like that only doom it NOT to happen. Had people 5 years ago had this thinking, we'd all still be using Pentium 90's. And I remember when the P90's came out, and I worked my ass off for 3 straight months to afford it. (I was 17 years old.) And I am sure I will work my ass off for the 3000mhz when they come out. Slate
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.