Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Grandmasters at home with their PCs

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 14:29:41 09/05/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 05, 2001 at 16:37:12, Francesco Di Tolla wrote:

>On September 05, 2001 at 12:42:38, Roy Eassa wrote:
>
>>How do the top grandmasters use applications like Fritz, Junior, Shredder, and
>>Tiger at home on their PCs?  Do they play against them?  (If so, fast or slow?
>>Do they win or lose a majority of games?)  Do they analyze with them?
>>
>>I've heard grandmasters use chess databases, which is no surprise, but I haven't
>>heard much about how they use today's really strong engines.  Does anybody have
>>good information on this?  How about any grandmasters who read this forum?
>
>In NewInChess (the famous dutch magazine) there are often commentators that
>report computer found tactical shots. Among the youngsters of course anybody
>does (Morozevich, Van Wely, Leko, Kramnik, Anand....)
>
>E.g. in the last issue Morozevich gives the following line found in a sideline
>from a 'his electornic friend' (most probably Fritz):
>
>Morozevich - Kasparov (Astana 2001)
>
>[D] r3nrk1/2qb1ppp/p2ppP1B/4b3/1p2P1Q1/1BNR4/PPP3PP/5RK1 b - - 0 1
>
>white has just played
>
>18.f6!
>
>and he explains that after 18...Bxf6 19.Rxf6 bxc3 white should play 20.Rxc3
>and says that 20.Bxg7 does not work, because of the line (found with computer
>aid) 20...Qxc5! 21.Kh1 h5
>
>this 21....h5 is an example of strange move which a computer easely finds while,
>humans hardly find over the board. Well any GM would find it there, they could
>miss it from an earlier position.
>
>Kasparov uses the computer as well (he likes Junior btw).
>
>On the other side I never heard players like Timman to quote a computer found
>move. And it is pretty well known that Karpov in an advanced chess match against
>Anand was apparently not getting any benefit from the engine, and stopped using
>it preferring his intuition, while under time pressure.
>

With the help of Gambit Tiger 2.0 on 1.2 GHz AMD:

1... Bxf6 2. Rxf6 bxc3 3. Rxc3!
( 3. Bxg7?  Qc5+ !
  ( 3... h5 ?! 4. Qg5 Qc5+ 5. Qxc5 dxc5 6. Bxf8
    ( 6. Rxd7 Kxg7 7. Rf1 Nf6  Black is better. )
    6... Nxf6 7. Bxc5 cxb2 8. Rd1 Nxe4 9. Bd4 Ba4 10. Bxa4?
      ( 10. Bxb2 Bxb3 11. cxb3 Rc8  = )
   10... Rd8  Black wins. )
  4. Kh1 h5 5. Qg3 Nxg7 6. Rxc3 Qe5  Black is better. )
3... Qa5 4. Rf2 Qe5 5. Bg5 Rb8 6. Rg3
( 6. Be7 f5 7. exf5 Rf7 8. Bh4 also works. )
6... Rb4 7. Bf6 Rxe4 8. Qxg7+ Nxg7 9. Rxg7+ Kh8 10. Rxf7+ Qxf6 11. Rxf8+ Qxf8
12. Rxf8+ Kg7 13. Rd8 White should win.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.