Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderator nominations.

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 11:31:30 09/06/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 06, 2001 at 13:34:45, Mark Young wrote:

>On September 06, 2001 at 13:06:14, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>I have now received enough emails that a response here seems to be
>>reasonable.
>>
>>I do not want to be a moderator for the next "term".  Not because I
>>don't want to be involved, but rather, because I believe it is important
>>to have a bit of variety in the moderators for lots of reasons.  It is not
>>always easy, it is not always hard.  But it does take _some_ time to do
>>things properly.  I think that more should have a chance to see how difficult
>>it can be at times.
>>
>>I will certainly be happy to run for the _next_ election, if someone wants
>>to nomimate me.  And I will be happy to serve if enough vote for me to make
>>that happen.  But two consecutive terms is enough for the moment.  There are
>>_plenty_ of people here that can do as well or better than I have done.  They
>>should get the opportunity (if it can be called that).  :)
>>
>>Bob
>
>Things seem to run the smoothest when the old guard are the moderators, I hope
>Bruce will run.


I think he has gone on record with the same idea as I gave.  IE not this time.

But I am not certain...



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.