Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 14:39:54 09/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2001 at 14:31:30, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On September 06, 2001 at 13:34:45, Mark Young wrote: > >>On September 06, 2001 at 13:06:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>I have now received enough emails that a response here seems to be >>>reasonable. >>> >>>I do not want to be a moderator for the next "term". Not because I >>>don't want to be involved, but rather, because I believe it is important >>>to have a bit of variety in the moderators for lots of reasons. It is not >>>always easy, it is not always hard. But it does take _some_ time to do >>>things properly. I think that more should have a chance to see how difficult >>>it can be at times. >>> >>>I will certainly be happy to run for the _next_ election, if someone wants >>>to nomimate me. And I will be happy to serve if enough vote for me to make >>>that happen. But two consecutive terms is enough for the moment. There are >>>_plenty_ of people here that can do as well or better than I have done. They >>>should get the opportunity (if it can be called that). :) >>> >>>Bob >> >>Things seem to run the smoothest when the old guard are the moderators, I hope >>Bruce will run. > > >I think he has gone on record with the same idea as I gave. IE not this time. > >But I am not certain... I'm not going to do it. In fact, I'm going to try to not do it again for a really long time. I would like to see someone who has done it before, and who is sane, like Pete McKenzie, plus two people who have never done it. People who read and post a lot should volunteer to do this. It's not that bad as long as you don't insist that everything be done after a vote. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.