Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:16:47 09/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2001 at 17:16:04, Mig Greengard wrote: >And you all, of course... > >Looks like a completely unfair advantage for Kramnik to me. Answers, and further >questions, are welcome. I'll keep an eye here. > >http://www.kasparovchess.com/serve/templates/folders/show.asp?p_docID=17571&p_docLang=EN > >Mig I understood from previous post of mark young that kramnik said that he did not get the program. There is an agreement but it seems that chessbase is not going to follow the agreement so the agreement is not important for the discussion. Kramnik also said that he is going to play even without getting the program so a match is going to be played. I can also say add parallel machines are not deterministic so even if kramnik has the program it does not mean that he can predict all the moves of the games. If programmers want to beat prepared humans when the humans get the program then I believe that they can try one of the following ways: 1)making some changes in the evaluation that happens only in the dates of the match By this way the human can learn nothing from getting the exact program because he also needs to play at the exact date. Changing the date in the computer is not going to help if the program reads the date from some internet site. 2)giving the exact program but the program asks the user for a passward that only chessbase know so the opponent cannot use it. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.