Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 15:48:55 09/06/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2001 at 17:44:28, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >On September 06, 2001 at 17:19:06, Dieter Buerssner wrote: > >>On September 06, 2001 at 13:19:41, Otello Gnaramori wrote: >> >>>But Eduard already admitted in previous posts of him that he uses sometimes >>>"trial and error" approaches, that involves obviously the well known "takeback" >>>key... >> >>Eduard has sent me games against Yace with email. They were including logs >>files. I could not see any takebacks. >> >>Regards, >>Dieter > > You know that at fixed time control , comps tends to make the same move , so if >I make a mistake let's say at move 15., I can safely restart the game (after >having annotated the moves so far) being pretty sure that the comp will make >again the same moves and then arrived to the 15. make my right move : that is a >refining process that at the end of the complete cycle of trials and errors will >at the end give me the victory or at least the draw... >So if the logs contain the last game of this trial and error process there are >moves without any mine mistakes or takeback involved. >You probably are thinking that I'm too much a "suspecting" guy, but without a >direct control of a supervising third party (possibly impartial and neutral) I >can't trust too much those games. > >With best regards. Whatever way these games are played, they show severe weaknesses of top chess programs. As I catch it, this is exactly what Eduard wants to display. And he has succeeded, IMHO. Whether take backs or not is, from my point of view, totally irrelevant here. Sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.